雅思写作范文50篇

来源：画鸵萌宠网

Version 00108

Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theaters

and sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and

education. Agree or not agree?

=================================================

范文1

Nowadays, the gap between the city and the countryside becomes more and more overt, which arouses colossal concerns. To understand the solution, let’s take a closer look at the causes of the gap at first.

The main reason of the gap is the unequal investment between city and rural area. China is a typical example. While more and more money is being invested to the coastal areas and big cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai, the lack of investment barriers greatly the society development of rural area and western regions

The low education level partly sharps the gap. There is no doubt that the prime force of productivity is education. However, because of poverty, thousands of people go to work without graduating from primary school. The poorer, the few children go to school. This bad cycle finally leads to the dream of rich becoming a dream that is hard to realize.

Moreover, the rural area is short of people with high quality. A survey proved that most

of university students, whether they come from city or countryside, choose big cities instead of poor areas to work. The rural area can neither adept talent man nor attract talent man. No wonder the gap is increasing largely.

Hence, The government ought to knock itself out to decrease the gap as soon as possible. First, balance the investment between city and rural area. In addition, the education level should be improved, especially pay attention on raising high quality people. Besides, let more people realize the latent capacity of rural area in order to attract talent and investment. The set up of CCTV channel12-western region channel is a good example.

Only when the ways mentioned above are realized step by step, can the gap between the cities and the countryside be bridged.

范文2

Nowadays, many people argue against the government putting money on

building theaters and sports stadiums. They have claimed that medical care

and education would benefit the citizens and the country much more.

However, I believe it is worth building more theaters and arenas.

First, stadiums and arenas provide ideal places for people to have physical

exercises and entertainment. After a whole week’s hardworking, people can

enjoy a wonderful football game in the weekend, and refresh themselves

with a good relaxation there. Moreover, the physical exercises are good for

people’s health, which will ease the pressure of medical care.

Second, theaters and museums can be used as base areas of culture and his

tory education. The British Museum, which is the largest one in the world,

provides visitors with knowledge about the world culture and the arts. The

visitors to the museum are all overwhelmed by the magnificence of the

cultural and historical displays featuring mankind’s achievements. In additio

n, the performances shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich the lives o

f citizens. People can enjoy ballet, symphony, and Peking Opera in a theater,

which contain the soul of Chinese and western cultures.

Third, running theaters and stadiums can earn much money.And this amount

of money can do great contribution in other fields, including medical care,

and education. After winning the Olympic 2008,Beijing made a plan to spend

160 billion RMB building an Olympic Village. This will surely attract many

sports fans to China, which would be much rewarded, not only in economy

but the whole society.

You can tell form my commentary above,since building theaters and stadiums

benefit not only individuals but also the state, it is very worthy of these

expenses.And the government should speed up the pace of the constructions.

范文3

An argument often heard these days is that whether or not the government should put money on building theaters and stadiums. Some believe that instead of spending money on this area, Medical care and education, both of which are basic developing factors of one country should be spent more money on. After weighting the pros and cons, I disagree with this opinion.

Firstly, theaters and stadiums are best choice for people relaxing. Most of workers, especially white collar who often feel nervous after one day’s hard work, need to relax both mentally and physically. Compared with staying at home, it is much better way to stay in comfortable theater and listen to a wonderful concert.

In addition, going to theaters and stadiums affect the same effect as education and medical care. Having more chances to go to theaters can help them mold character. There is no

better way to keep healthy than doing proper sports in the daily. In this way, the culture and health will be improved greatly, which plays the same role of education and medical care.

Moreover, theaters and stadiums are basis essential facilities to a developed city. Take holding an Olympic games as an example, it is no doubt it will take millions of money to build stadiums. Why the winner country is proud of that. Because this is a confirmation given by whole world.

Of course I don’t mean that the more theaters and stadiums, the better society will be, after all, nothing can take the important place of medical care and education.

In summary, the key point is to keep both of this two part developing. Only in this way, can all people live better in future.

V108

Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theaters and sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or not agree?

Recently, a criticism often heard is that the government tends to put too much money on building theaters and sports stadiums. They maintain that medical care and education would benefit the citizens and the country much more. However, I advocate building more theaters and arenas. Numerous circumstances lead to the worth of building theaters and arenas, but here are two main reasons:

What strikes me most of all is that theaters and sports stadiums provide ideal places for

people to build up a world of relaxation. After five days of hardworking, people can refresh themselves by taking physical exercises and enjoining a football game there. Meanwhile, exercises is to health what water is to fish. The physical exercises can benefit people’s health, which will surely ease the pressure of medical care. Moreover, it provides people a good opportunity to enter into communion with each other, which will benefit people’s mental health.

Beyond this, it is also of paramount importance to use theaters and museums as the “social classroom” of culture and history education. The Sydney Opera House, which is the mother and father of all modern landmark buildings, has come to define not only a city, but also an entire nation and continent. The opera house shows the concept of modernism and the never properly finished inside provides visitors with a story of its creator Jorn Utzon. In addition, the performances which contain the soul of human civilization shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich the lives of people from all over the world.

Certainly, medical care and education both play dominant roles, but building theaters and sports stadiums will benefit not only the individual both mentally and physically, but a nation and continent permanently

V108

Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theaters and sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or not agree?

Recently, a criticism often heard is that the government tends to put too much money o

n building theaters and sports stadiums. They maintain that medical care and education would benefit the citizens and the country much more. However, I advocate building more theaters and arenas. Numerous circumstances lead to the worth of building theaters and arenas, but here are two main reasons:

What strikes me most of all is that theaters and sports stadiums provide ideal places for people to build up a world of relaxation. After five days of hardworking, people can refresh themselves by taking physical exercises and enjoining a football game there. Meanwhile, exercises is to health what water is to fish. The physical exercises can benefit people’s health, which will surely ease the pressure of medical care. Moreover, it provides people a good opportunity to enter into communion with each other, which will benefit people’s mental health.

V108

Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theatres and sports stadiums, they should spend more money on medical care and education. Agree or not agree?

Government, as the controller of the macroeconomy, usually put large amount of money on building theatres and sports stadiums to stimulate the consumption. Especially when globle economy is in recession, stimulation is one of the methods for government to catch the economy’s fall. However, to my opinion, government should spend more money on medical care and education.

For men, health and education are the basic elements for development. We often say health is the best wealth. Without health, even if you are a millionaire you will not enjoy your life. The society needs more medical care to ensure people to live happily and create more fortune. This is a physical base for development of society. The spiritual foundation should be obtained from education. Only with more knowledge, can we catch up with the improvement of economy, society and technology. We need healthy people and brilliant minds to change our world into a better one. Theatres and sports stadiums are signs for higher standard of living. Compared with the basic development factors, they are minor.

Insufficiency in medical care and education will impose great stress on poor people and produce unstable factors for society. If government invested too much on recreational places, it has to lessen the expenditure on medical care and education since the total amount of distributable money will not be changed. Such action will do little influence on riches, but affect poors greatly. They can’t take out money from their own pockets to see doctors nor pursue higher education. Dissatisfaction for government will arise gradually. Then, how long the government can exist with the society fluctuated?

To make all people live and work in peace and contentment and to be a long-last power, government should do more to secure people’s basic rights. Establishments for improving living standards are in second place.

v108 Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theatres or

sports stadiums but should spend more money on medical care and education. Do you

agree or not agree?

Theatres and sports stadiums are facilities with the purpose of enriching people’

s spiritual life. However, some people claim that the government should spend mor

e money on medical care and education rather than on such recreational programs.

As a matter of fact, these people fail to realize the essence of this issue. I di

sagree with this statement for the following reasons.

First, with the development of society, the basic material needs for people has m

ainly satisfied, a more important task for the government is to improve people’s

spiritual life. Human beings differ from other animal species in that we live no

t only for prolonging our lives, but also for spiritual pursuit.

Second, entertainment projects contribute to the development of economy, as well

as collect money to solve people’s basic needs. An typical example can be found

in the fact that every country is eager to win the right of hold the Olympics mai

nly because of the economic benefits it brings. Another example is that many spor

ts and cultural activities have donated a considerable amount of fun for benefic

projects.

Last but not least, entertainment and cultural services also play an important ro

le in education as well as improvement of people’s health. As the living standar

d enhance, people tend to not only go to school for education, but also go to the

atres to receive another form of education. Sport facilities such as stadiums pro

vide opportunities for people to exercise their body.

According to the reasons I give above, it can be concluded that entertainment and

cultural constructions are worth building. The statement that government shouldn

’t put money on them is invalid.

V108 投资剧院运动场---医疗和教育

The reason that government-who is in dispose of public money-is elected primari

ly to improve the social welfare of its people. As long as people in a society la

ck the basic need, such as medical care or education , the use of public funds to

support theatres and sports stadiums is inappropriate-and, perhaps, even cruel-

when one considers all the potential uses of such money.

According to the psychological pundit Maslo, human needs can be classified into f

ive categories: survival, safety and love, others recognition, self-realization,

and spiritual refinement. Among the five categories, the need for medical care an

d education is on the lowest floor of the pyramid and is also crucial.

The basic function of theatres and sport stadiums is to give people large extent

of pleasure in order to ensure them to work more effectively and efficiently to c

ontribute more to the society. While them, classified into the category of spirit

ual refinement, is at the pinnacle of the pyramid. If we to realize our spiritual

refinement, we should first fulfill our basic need. Or our seemingly resplendent

pyramid is on the verge of collapse due to its lack of a solid plinth.

The first and foremost step of its aim to fund medical care and education is t

o satisfy basic need. In case that such the condition as described in the topic h

appened (though very rarely), the government will be overturned. See multitudes o

f revolts of peasants in China’s history.

Even though people’s basic needs can be fulfilled, the society, especially the g

overnment, should not use all its money to the theatres and sports stadiums, a pr

oper proportion of the investment must be considered exactly.

Version 00109

the computer are widely used in education and some people think teacher

are not play important role in the classroom .

to what extend do you agree?(agree/disagree)

范文1

Computers are widely used in education and some people think teachers are

not playing an important role in classroom. To what extent do you agree or

disagree?

The 21st century is the period of information, in which computers will play

an important role in every area of our lives. Recently, computer assisted

education has become more and more popular in primary schools, high

schools and colleges. The computer’s multimedia abilities make the classes

lively and interesting. As a result, some people have said that teachers are

no longer playing a significant role in classroom.I can hardly agree with the

First, it is the teacher who creates the software used in class. For example,

the software may be an outline of the teacher’s lecture.If you listen to som

e lectures, you will find that the lectures contain far more information than

the multimedia software includes. While showing the class, most teachers will

expand the knowledge extent, especially adding some latest discoveries and

breakthroughs. So, the computer is just an assistant, which makes the class

more vivid and clear. Teachers and students are the main part of a class.

Second, computers cannot organize activities in class in place of teachers.

For example, we often do some group work during classes, and it is the

teachers who set the groups and control the time. After checking our

homework, teachers will understand what the real weakness of students is,

and adjust their classes to improve their teaching, while computers cannot.

Moreover,the interaction between students and teachers is very useful.During

the asking and answering of questions, students pose problems and find

answers more clearly. But computers, now, have not that intelligence.

All in all, although computer technology is developing very quickly and

computers can solve more and more problems without people, teachers still

play an important role in class. And I insist that, no matter how the

technology develops, teachers will be in the front of the classroom forever

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

范文2

The computer is widely used in education，and some people think teachers d

o not play important roles in the classroom. To what extend do you agree or

disagree?

In this period of communication,computer has been used in all kinds of fields

widely, and plays a particular role in our lives. Especially computer has

become more and more important in educational field, therefore dozens of

people considered teachers could be replaced computers that will go with the

current of the times. The above point is certainly wrong; this essay will outl

ine three reasons.

The main reason is that people’s brain better than computer. Firstly, people

design all kinds of computer’s programs. Secondly, computer doesn’t hav

e logistic ideation. Computer only can defend on that designer inputted

computer’s programs to judge a question’s right or wrong. In other words,

computer can’t defend on thinking that computer independently analyzes a

question’s right or wrong. In case, designer inputted programs that are

wrong. Computer output the result that also will be wrong. If this kind of

problem happened in classroom, students would be infused plenty of wrong

information.

Another reason is that computer’s programs designed software of education

that could be amended difficultly.If software of education of bugs were foun

d, commonly these of problems couldn’t be solved in the classroom. The so

ftware was amended that means total of program were corrected, not only

parts of program were inserted or amended usually.

Last but not the least reason is computer is mechanical,it couldn’t be suited

all kinds of students and different demands. As students’ intellect is differe

nt, same of software couldn’t base on every status of student to set a perf

ect project.

In conclusion, computers couldn’t instead of the position of teachers in the

classroom, however computer is an absolutely good helper for teacher

范文3

In this IT age, computers are widely used in the classroom in order to enrich the methods of teaching. This phenomenon gives some the illusion that the thing teaching students is no longer the teacher but a computer. Personally, I disagree with this opinion.

As another machines, computer doesn’t enable to control itself. Though computers are capable of learning from their mistakes and improving on their performance, they need details instructions from human being in order to be able to operate. They can never, as it were lead independent lives, no mention teaching students. In case a computer lacks the control of a teacher, there is no difference between a computer and waste.

Not only this, but computers, unlike a teacher, can’t solve a variety of new problems. Everything is developing in today’s society, including education. For example, a student suddenly asks a creative question that the computer isn’t programmed for, it can do nothing, while teacher can explain clearly though abundant teaching experience.

Last but not least, the computer can’t communicate with students from emotion. Such as an eyesight or gesture of teacher can transfer his or her idea and feeling to students. In t

his way, students can feel more human touch in the class. In comparison, the computer is too dry and dusty to understand.

All in all, no matter how nice a computer is, it can’t take the place of teacher. Of course, I don’t mean that computer is useless. In contrary, I believe it will become the most powerful assistants to teacher in further.

范文4

Computer, the most exciting and significant invention in 20 century, will reshape our lives and our world. As a result, some people proclaim that computers should be involved into our classroom, and replace the roles of human teachers. However, I cannot agree with their point of view.

Admittedly, as the useful tools, computers can become the optimum assistants for human teachers in the classroom. To beginning, vivid pictures shown on screen can motivate students’ interest and curiosity dramatically. Moreover, the combination of computers and Internet can provide children the abundant information. Although computers enjoy considerable merits, they cannot compare with human teachers for two main reasons.

Among countless factors which influence my inclination, there is a most conspicuous one: computers are not as qualified as human teachers in academic fields. As we all know, students can get the final result of a mathematic question under the help of computers, however, they are still confused on the whole computing process. By contrast, our human teachers’ performance is much better in those cases. They not only can teach students how to analyze and compute the question, but also can remind them what are the possible errors that t

hey may meet. Thus, human teachers are more adequate than computers in academic aspect.

The second advantage of human teachers is they can guide students to deal with some psychological problems that they meet in schools. In China, sometimes, teachers even burden many responsibilities that students’ parents have. For example, as for the student with rebellious spirit, the important duty for teachers is to prevent the student from campus violence, even crime. Obviously, computers cannot do that.

In summary, from what has been discussed above, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that the positions of human teachers are unshakable, and computers cannot take the places of them.

范文5

with the development of new techonology and science,computer are widely used in education.therefore,some people think we dont need teachers anymore.i totally disagree with the above point.

there is no denying that the computer bring great benefit to people and are of great help to students.computer can be programmed to simple digits of question,as the students answer these digits,their theoritical knowledge can be reinforced.

however,in practice and learning of complex questions,computer can never replace the humain brain or surpass the human intelligence.computer only can tell your the final correct answer.but it cant provide students opportunity to think over it,which limited their creativit

y.teaching itself is an art rather than a machnican activity.therefore,teachers function can not be neglected.

firstlly.computer only can do work according to the procedure fomulated previously.they can not answer all question in defferent way.teachers,however,can teach students according their attitute.some students who have better ability to accept knowledge,under teachers'guidance,can be save time to gain other knowledge.

secondly,facing the vivid dilivery from teachers,students can be improved their motivation and concentration.the effective communication operated by teachers not only can help students understand the knowledge,teachers also can teach students how to be a valuable people,which cant be done by computer.

in addition,various teaching methods can help student absorb the knowledge rapidly.when students meet with the thorny question,teachers not only can explain it in different way,they also can show them the important deductive process.

therefore,i would say teacher is the good compesation for flexiabilly lacting in the computer.i totally disagree with view that we dont need teachers anymore!

范文6

“Get up, boy, it is time to go to school.”

“I dislike having get up early. I can take an on-line lesson at anytime I like.”

It is a completely ordinary dialogue occurring in modern life. Yes, it is the com

puter, whose ever-accelerated updating brings about tremendous changes in our sch

ool lives. A typical application is Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI), which ai

ds teacher to impart knowledge to student more efficiently by it’s multimedia ch

aracters. However, a vigorous debate over the issue whether or not teacher are by

no means important in pedagogy field has intrigued the public. In my submission,

the computer can be great help of teacher but they can never replace or surpass

the position of teacher. I will offer the following reasons.

Firstly, CAI are designed and programmed by human instructor. They only condense

parts of teacher’s experience and intelligence. Moreover, being a successful ins

tructor requires not just these factors but a wealth of experience and interpret

new experiences using that information. The computer after all are man-made machi

ne.

Secondly, the progress of instruction is complicated and complex, and the educati

onal achievement of CAI is limited. Some sorts of course, such as basic education

al course( 想想什么课程用电脑教不好), are not necessarily to be expressed by the

computer to reach productive effect.

Finally, communications and interactions with teacher and computer are quite diff

erent. The latter is too impersonal, which ruins the pleasure of emotional exchan

ges. Sometimes gazing at the cold flickering screen is a disinteresting and tirin

g experience.

Admittedly, though computer may help teacher to provide student with a richer and

more effective learning environment, yet they can not substitute the position of

teacher, not only today, but the future.

范文7

Computer, as the most powerful tool in 21 century, is widely used in education areas. Whether computers can instead of teachers become a controversial issue. From my point, I don’t think computers can take the place of teachers.

First and foremost, computer cannot communicate with students. Every human being has feeling. Teachers are not only teaching students knowledge but also showing their loves to students when they are teaching. How to have a conversation with others and how to take

care of others can be learned from teachers. For example, teacher can take you to the hospital when you are sick. In comparison, computers cannot likely to it.

Secondly, computers cannot help students when the get confused. Asking teachers is the best way to do when students get any quires. However, computers do not have this function. Study is a two-way process, teachers can excite students’ imaginations and fire their creations.

Last but not least, computers cannot organize teaching activities instead of teachers. Take England as an example, students need to do a lot of practical experiments, especially in physics and chemistry. When they do these experiments, students usually work together as a group and discuss with teachers. Team work is a very important part to shape students’ personalities.

From what has been discussed above, we might safely say that computers can never take the place of teachers. We should always remember that human beings are the host of technology and computer is a machine no matter how clever it is!

(251 words)

媛

范文8

V109 Computers “V” Teachers

The computer is widely used in education and some people think teachers are not playi

ng an important role in the classroom. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

With more and more extensive use of computers in education, some people claim that the importance attached to teachers has been jeopardized. Therefore, computers will replace teachers in the classroom. However, it seems quite clear to me that learning from teachers is the most important way that cannot be substituted for students.

Naturally, some people maintain that computer should instead of the old way of education. They hold that the strong function of the computer offers a new mode of education, which is more interesting, more vivid and more acceptable by children. The students will not face to the serious teachers and calm classes any more, which are replaced by a brand-new world offered by the Internet. In addition, this can decrease the investment on the foundational education and save the human resources and material resources.

As an assistant, computers do help teachers with their work, but they can never replace the important role of a real teacher. The main functions of any computer are storage and calculation. It cannot think on its own anyway. All the teaching data stored in computers are the essence of teaching experience generalized by many teachers during their work. Hence, to assist education, what a computer can do is just to repeat the contents summarized by real teachers.

In addition, each student has different talents and different defects, and accordingly, they may come across various problems during their study. Computer programmer designing the software, however, cannot predict these problems. Therefore, a single computer can never solve these problems without a teacher’s guidance

Furthermore, if the significance of teacher has been weakened, the number of teachers may be decreased, that is to say, many teachers may be laid-off. If such a case comes to reality, series of social problems will break out, such as the drop of working opportunity which will surely make the burden of whole society become heavier and heavier.

In conclusion, although computer-aided-education has spread widely, teachers still play s crucial part in the classroom, which cannot and will not be replaced by computer.

范文9

as the most important invention in the 21 century,computers have windspread in the world,and the use of it has become the necessity of various spheres both in our work and in our daily life. although computers are also greatly utilized in the education field,teachers are still playing a crucial part on the platform. personally,i believe that teachers should not be replaced by computers due to the following reasons.

being the architect of humanbeings' moral, teachers shoulder the responsibilities of passing knowledge to students as well as shaping them to be real men with good qualities. students may learn some certain knowledge from computers which are cold and senseless, but good qualities can only be taught by teachers.

at the same time,computers might not give detailed and understandable elaboration of complicated theories. after judging whether the answers are right or wrong computers fail to tell them why they make such mistakes. the problems can only be dealt with by teachers.

in addition,some elementary academic exchanges,such as discussion and association,ca

nnot be organised by computers.nevertheless, teachers make up the deficiendy.by this means,students' learning enthusiasm is greatly activated.

above all,computers bring about many significant revolutions in the education field,but teachers are still the hosts of the classroom.we should always bear in mind that men are the owner of technology and no matter how intelligent the computers are,they are merely man-made machines.

范文10

Along with the mass use of computer technology in education circles, we are delighted to witness the uncountable conveniences be brought by computer. Some people even argue that teacher will not be important in classroom any more. Is this reasonable? Personal speaking, I oppose holding such a ridiculous conclusion.

In the first place, the feature of teaching defines teachers as an essential part in education. It is well known that teaching is a process of mutual-communication: firstly, teachers impart/initiate knowledge or ideas to students, then students should promptly transfer their feedback to teachers, moreover, teachers will give students the final interpretation according to their specific requirement. Besides, teachers also can (teach students in accordance of their aptitude). In contrast, what computers can do is merely to display materials which have already stored in their EMS memory or mechanically execute operator’s commands. We actually can not image what our education will being if computers substitute teachers totally.

As to another reason, it seems that teacher’s role as a supervisor is more and more overt. Computer is indeed a controversy, it not only can be an efficient education assistant, bu

t also can become an addiction which includes too much violent and (pornographic propaganda). Youngsters do not mature fully in psychology, therefore, without teachers' supervision, many children would spend hours playing computer games or surfing unhealthy websites, which are regarded as a waste of valuable time and intelligence, instead of trying to have a good command of knowledge and skills.

We never deny that computers are absolutely an available education implements, furthermore, the combination of teacher and computer technology will greatly improve our education quality. However, from all of the grounds of argument mentioned above, we can safely draw a conclusion that teacher will not be replaced by computer in the classroom.

范文11

v109 The computer are widely used in education，and some people think teacher ar

e not play important role in the classroom .

To what extend do you agree?

Computers nowadays are more and more widely used in education. Hence, some people

claim that teachers are no longer playing important roles in the classroom. I co

mpletely agree with this statement. Although teacher may be more emotional than c

omputers, the later actually far outdoes in educating students, for the following

three reasons.

First, it is an undoubted fact that computer are more likely to provide sufficien

t information to students. Neither a well trained graduate from education institu

te nor an experienced teacher can offer more knowledge than an advanced computer.

Human brain is more suitable for creative activities, but not in conveying infor

mation. As a result of the rapid development in technology, the computer’s capac

ity of containing information will become much stronger.

Second, computers are more efficient in educating students than teachers, not onl

y because they will merely make mistakes, but also due to that the will not feel

worn out after a long time of work. It goes without saying that teachers are some

times complained to transfer mistaken messages to students. And the latter, lack

of enough related knowledge, finally become the victims of such mistakes. Further

more, as they were so tired after a whole day working, teachers are often slow in

reaction while asked questions by students. Computers, which can never effected

by emotional factors, have no such disadvantages.

Last but not least, children are becoming more and more familiar with computers w

hile they are being taught by this new technology. It’s widely accepted that com

puter has become an essential tool for our daily life. Children could learn how t

o master it better by the process of being educated by it rather than taking an i

ntentional class presented by a teacher. Classroom, as everybody believes, is a p

lace where students learn knowledge and skills, both academic and practical. So i

t should be the duty for school to prepare students for the computer-oriented soc

iety.

All in all, although teachers still contribute to education, we can’t turn a bli

nd eye to the fact that they are not important any more compared to another kind

of tutors-computers

范文12

开头：

正文：

As to another reason, it seems that teacher’s role as a supervisor is more and more overt. Computer is indeed a controversy, it not only can be an efficient education assistant, but also can become an addiction which includes too much violent and (pornographic propaganda). Youngsters do not mature fully in psychology, therefore, without teachers' supervision, many children would spend hours playing computer games or surfing unhealthy websites, which are regarded as a waste of valuable time and intelligence, instead of trying to have a good command of knowledge and skills.

结尾：

Version 00111(2003.2.4日英国诺丁汗 a类)

Is it nature or nurture that plays a major role in the development of personality? What's your opinion?

范文1

IN certain respects, children are the same all over the world. But many

factors affect the development of children, both parental support and

education being major influences. There are vast differences between

schooling styles, and parental attitudes towards children, in China and the

West.

Some of these differences have obvious causes, for example, the \"Little

Emperor\" syndrome in China. Parents everywhere have dreams for their

offspring. However, the concentration of energy invested into planning for a

child's future is noticeable in China, as it is not diluted by the presence of

siblings.

This adoration can be seen in other ways. One of the most common is

spoiling children, giving them everything they want. Some of the time this is

a reward for good work, although there are children who receive all they wa

nt merely because they demand it from their parents.

Hard work?

Parents also have this tendency to spoil children in the West. If a child does

start to see itself as the all-deserving star of the Universe,usually its siblings

will tease and bully the child until it stops feeling self-important.

Another contrast between the upbringing of children in China and the West is

in schooling. Without a doubt, Chinese children work harder than their

European and American counterparts. Their industriousness is admirable, and

in comparison, Western students are lazy. In European countries, teenagers

will often have a Saturday job, or holiday job, to supplement their allowance.

This is rare in China,where education is considered of paramount importance,

and time working detracts from study.The same contrast is true of romantic

relationships between teenagers. I spoke to Han Li, a 16-year old student in

Huhhot, about boyfriends. She said: \"I have no time for a boyfriend, even if

I did want one. I must study hard, there is a lot of pressure on me to get

good grades and go to university.\"

The style of teaching is very different in China from in the West. The notion

of \"repeating after a teacher'' seems old-fashioned and redundant in America

and Europe. Large class sizes may be the reason for the popularity of this

teaching method. In England, any class over 30 is considered large enough

to impair learning. However, I have noticed that this parrot-style of learning

is being replaced with more progressive methods of education in many

Chinese schools.

The perfect solution would be to combine Western and Chinese education

methods. Combat the laziness and apathy of Western students; encourage

initiative within Chinese students, by expecting independent thought as

opposed to mindless repetition. As for spoilt kids anywhere, some of these

children would benefit from a smack on the bum.

Genevieve Roberts graduated from Leeds University, England. She has spent

the last eight months teaching in China. Anyone with unusual cultural or

social experiences who wants to share them with us here at 21st Century

can send a copy to elt@21stcentury.com.cn.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

范文2

There has been an argument on personality and individual’s development fo

r a long time. The key point of the dispute is which factor plays a more

important role, genes or training after birth? In my opinion, the latter is the

crucial complication, though genes are significant.

Although genes have great effects on one’s personality, environment plays

a more important role in his further development. Let’s take an experiment

for instance. There was a research on a couple of identical twins who were

born in a big city, but they were separated after birth. One was taken to a

poor suburban area, while the other remained in the city. Fifteen years later,

surely, the one in city grew tall, strong, extroverted and well educated. By

contrast, the other was short, thin, introverted and nearly illiterate. This well

demonstrates the importance of nurturing.

In addition, education, especially early education, is another key factor.When

children are very young, they try to imitate their parents’ behaviors, and

run into some manners. After going to school, different education systems an

d even different courses students taking will make influence on their

personalities and ideas. Students of science and technology subjects are good

at logical thinking, while students of arts usually think in terms of imagine.

As you can tell from my comments above, no one can choose his nature,but

one can be greatly successful after striving for himself or being well educated.

And no one can be successful relying on his genes without good environmen

t. So, in my opinion, environmental influence and education will ultimately

decide one’s personality and development.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

范文3

Nowhere in the world has the issue of children’s education been so much

debated as in our society. Nowadays, many parents let their children attend

all kinds of courses that will help children to get a better future; therefore,

some people think that the postnatal nurture is more important than the

congenital factors for personal growth and progress. The above point is

certainly true; this essay will outline three reasons.

The main reason is that success of a child would not be separated from right

teaching and personal effort. Currently, lots of famous scientists and

politicians gain huge success in the world, as they are long-term to hard

work. Moreover, the main reason why plenty of developing countries drop

behind is their poor education.

Another reason is that if people do not work hard but only depend on their

high intellect, they will be far from successful. For instance, the little Bronte

was quite clever during his childhood; he was particularly adept at writing.

But he was so satisfied with his superior intellect that he did not study

carefully. Finally, he became an idle person. However, his sisters became

famous authors as a result of their hard study. They are Charlotte Bronte

and Emily Bronte. Charlotte wrote “Jane Eyre “, “Wuthering Heights” was

written by Emily.

Last but not the least reason is the advantages of natural factors that are

more and more similar.Plenty of advanced technological products are invente

d and widely used.They can supply people’s gaps.In the past, the difference

of mathematical ability was remarkable. With the invention of the calculator,

people can hardly find out the difference.

In conclusion, scientific and proper teaching is the most significant factor for

personal growth and development. If people are satisfied with their

advantages, they will become the biggest failures.

范文4

(278words)

Nowadays, most of children are the center of a family, so the issue about which plays major role in personality, nature or nurture, is paid increasing attention by parents. As to me, I am fond of that molding one's character depends on nurture rather than nature.

People's character will affect greatly by the people around them especially their parents. The survey proves the possibility of commit of person who deleted born in a family which have a crime is one to four times higher than the normal family's person's. To image, when a child shape character, always have a bad example around him or her, no wonder the crime possibility is much higher. So just as the saying goes:\" he who keeps company with the wolf

will learn to howl.\"

Moreover, the growing environment influences child's personality unconsciously. There is a famous story in China: Aiming to find a willing studying condition, a mother moves for three times. They at last move nearby school. From then on, the boy who used to be naughty corrects his bad habits and changes into a hardworking student. After he grows up, this boy becomes one of the greatest philosophers in Chinese history---Mencius.

This story really shows how important role that the environment play in children's personality.

Of course, we couldn't neglect the effect of nature, such as parents' gene. The child is a chip off the old block. Some characters proved by medical research have already existed before human were born.

All in all, as for one person's, both nature and nurture influence the development of quality. Personally, I believe the nurture can partly make up the shortage of nature.

范文5

Difference between children's education

By 21ST

Published on 2003-01-30

Posted on 2003-02-04

IN certain respects, children are the same all over the world. But many factors affect the development of children, both parental support and education being major influences. There are vast differences between schooling styles, and parental attitudes towards children, in China and the West.

Some of these differences have obvious causes, for example, the \"Little Emperor\" syndrome in China. Parents everywhere have dreams for their offspring. However, the concentration of energy invested into planning for a child's future is noticeable in China, as it is not diluted by the presence of siblings.

This adoration can be seen in other ways. One of the most common is spoiling children, giving them everything they want. Some of the time this is a reward for good work, although there are children who receive all they want merely because they demand it from their parents.

Hard work?

Parents also have this tendency to spoil children in the West. If a child does start to see itself as the all-deserving star of the Universe, usually its siblings will tease and bully the child until it stops feeling self-important.

Another contrast between the upbringing of children in China and the West is in schooling. Without a doubt, Chinese children work harder than their European and American counterparts. Their industriousness is admirable, and in comparison, Western students are lazy. In European countries, teenagers will often have a Saturday job, or holiday job, to supplement their allowance. This is rare in China, where education is considered of paramount importan

ce, and time working detracts from study. The same contrast is true of romantic relationships between teenagers. I spoke to Han Li, a 16-year old student in Huhhot, about boyfriends. She said: \"I have no time for a boyfriend, even if I did want one. I must study hard, there is a lot of pressure on me to get good grades and

go to university.\"

The style of teaching is very different in China from in the West. The notion of \"repeating after a teacher'' seems old-fashioned and redundant in America and Europe. Large class sizes may be the reason for the popularity of this teaching method. In England, any class over 30 is considered large enough to impair learning. However, I have noticed that this parrot-style of learning is being replaced with more progressive methods of education in many Chinese schools.

The perfect solution would be to combine Western and Chinese education methods. Combat the laziness and apathy of Western students; encourage initiative within Chinese students, by expecting independent thought as opposed to mindless repetition. As for spoilt kids anywhere, some of these children would benefit from a smack on the bum.

Genevieve Roberts graduated from Leeds University, England. She has spent the last eight months teaching in China. Anyone with unusual cultural or social experiences who wants to share them with us here at 21st Century can send a copy to elt@21stcentury.com.cn.

By Genevieve Roberts, SPECIAL TO 21ST CENTURY

范文6严禁模仿）

Introduction ( 38words)

Human's endeavor in researching on factors affecting one's personality and development has offered quite a amount of proofs. My position may provide you with a clear notion that nurture plays a far more important role in one's development.

Body 1 (95words)

Reportedly there was a maid, a countryside girl with only an educational background of primary school, working for an American professor who worked in Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. After two years of stay at the learned and exotic surroundings, amazingly this plain girl could speak fluent English and started to help the host to receive and send e-mails to his students. When the professor left for New York later, soon she sought a post at a multinational firm. This example clearly reveals a common truth: appropriate nurture can turn an average person to be competent. (topic sentence)

Body 2 (words)

I will then go on to examine my position by offering other facts. It is well believed that overseas graduates who once furthered their education in foreign universities are taking incredible places in China because these elites have a broader way of thinking and their bilingual and creative capabilities have proved themselves much better than domestic ones. In contrast, some people show their linguistic talent by precisely speaking a variety of dialects but still lead a poor life because no foreign language learning process has been conducted for them.

Conclusion ( 42words)

To sum up, the competence of a former maid and the qualities of overseas Chinese students already illustrate an undeniable fact: a right way of nurture can mould one to be outstanding whilst extraordinary nature without nurture is a waste of resource.

范文7

Which element between nature and nurture plays the major role in children’s personality and development is always a controversial problem. Of course, which you prefer depends on your own experience, life style and emotional concern. Here, I would like to illustrate my point of view about it.

Admittedly, different nature determines people have distinguished starting points in their lifetime. To beginning, in light of medical research, a person’s blood type has considerable influence to his character. General speaking, for example, a person whose blood type is A means that his personality is amiable and tender probably. Besides, the physical condition, even appearance may influence a person’s development. Statistics shows that beautiful people are more confident than others, because they do not need to worry about the prejudice from public. Obviously, some parts of our personality have been decided when we born.

On the other hand, although nature is important during the course of shaping personality, we cannot ignore another essential element, nurture. There are many factors which affect the development of children, both parental support and education being vital influence. It is reported that the kid whose parents are divorced is more likely has psychological troubles than those with a harmonious family. By contrast, as we all know, good education will positi

vely cultivate a person’s personality and improve his self-restraint in a big way.

In summary, from what has been discussed above, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that partly because of different nature, partly because of different nurture, people have their unique personality.

范文8

For centuries,people have heatedly debated the problem that what

runs a more significant position in characteristic and development.

At first glance,it would seem that nature is the crucial factor.

Closerexamination reveals,however,that nurture makes the determinative

effect.Personally,I side with the later opinion.Some reasons as

follows can demonstrate my viewpoint.

Most important,elder generation's way of actionun fluences much on

children's psychology.Because of the small age,kids have little

understandings about the condition and they always intimate what

their parents do.It is frequent to find that the sons possess the

same gestures of walking or eating with the fathers.Meanwhile children

are using their parebns' way to think of and deal with matters out

of habit.

What is more,just as Edison's best-known saying goes:\"Genius is one

percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration.\" Everyone is no

exception.The heritage does give out benefit; however, its effect is

too limited.Man must make it through hardwork and proper cultivation.

In ancient China,Fang Zhongyong, concidered as a child prodigy, had a

talented ablity of poem creation.Unfortunatly,he did not acquire a well

education,which leaded to the lost of teputatuon ten years later.

Last but not least, superior postnatal nurture can bting a promissing

development to youngsterds.Numerous aspects o fchildren's personality

are formed after the borth such as the view of world and value.The nurture just serves as these points as it shows a correct direction to the youngs and tutors them.

From what has been mentioned above, we can safely come to the definitive conclusion that nurture is the most critical ingredient for personality and personal growth.

范文9

nowaday,variety of language and culture has been lost rapidly,as a matter of fact,the speed of language and culture dissapear is as fast as the speed of development of society.i would rather to give the main reasons for it and explore the good solution to this phenomenon.

firstly,its undeniable that the development of new technology and science contribute the ressesion of traditional culture.microwave,for example,save my mother time.throw the prepared and forzen food into it,we will have the dinner within a few minutes.but we will not have the delicious food cooked by my mother.gone foreveris the traditional cooking.

secontly,as the economic globalization is being carried out,the traditional culture is being under the threat of assimilation.especailly in chinese depress areas,as the western culture with investment floods into these nations,.the young people became obbessed with the fresh culture so that they miss very much their own culture.however,culture just like a mirror which reflect the value of one country,how can these cultures exist if the young people who are the hope of one country are tired of learning it?

in addition,nowaday the young people whose mother tongue is not english became crazy about learning english on the ground that english well can ensure them a decent job,a better life.they spent a lot of time in studying english so that they dont have spare time to develop and enrich their own language.so,its not surpring that many a language,only spoken

by few people,disappear one by one in the mordern society.

To sum up,the distinct culture make our world colourful .it is notonly belong to their own country,it also belong to the world.let us cherich our traditonal culture,for it embody the very costoms and culture,which sustain our family ,our friendship and our spirital life!

范文10

some people think the natural gift play the major role in the children's development.in contrast,other think the nurture is more important than nature .personally,its more advisale to choose the latter view than the former one.

to begin with the Einstein's bestknown saying:the gunius is 1% inspiration ,and 99% prespiration.even Einstein who is one of most wisest people in the world also have to think and study for months before he fomulate the famouse relativity of theory.in addition to it,there is also a countexample to support my point.in Ming dynasty of china,there was a 3-year-old boy who was genius at creating a perfect poem within 3 mins.but his father did not provide him opportunity to develop his ability,instead,he frequatly took his son to the banquet hold by the rich to perform how to make a quict poem in order to earn money.when this genius child grew up,his tallents dissappeared just for lacking of right education.so ,i fomulate the two important factors for the development of children's personality.

firstlly,the success of child would not seperated from round education.as the hebert spenser's famouse saying:education is has for it abject the information of charactors.its reported by scientists that the disble man also can performs as well as the nomal people if they are nurtured and educated.the parents as the first teacher and teachers should give proper in

struction and correct guidance to their development.

secondlly,indiviial great efforts is indispensable.the many politican and statemans gain success though the great efforts when they were young.there is also countexample.the most successful people may not be the most cleverest people.according to the studies conducted among the group who was the same class before 10 years,those whose average point is in the middle 50 % ,all became the richers and managers.while few of the young people who is upper 10 % became the bosses or excutives.studies show people who do not word hard only depend on their intelligence will be far from the sucess.

therefore,the kid is the seed,the nurture is the fertile soil in which the seed can grow well.among all ingredients for children's development,round education is very important,moreover,individial offort is also indispensable!

范文11

The contentious issue in the domain of sociology in the past mainly concentrated

on postnatal nurture and congenital element still has been steeped in controversy

nowadays. The key point of it is, which factor has top priority in personal grow

th and progress. On the strength of compelling and convincing research and eviden

ce, I prefer the former. This essay will outline the following reasons.

In the first place, environment and parents enlightenment play utmost and crucial

roles in children’s personalities and further development. When they are young,

they often unconsciously imitate parents’ behaviors. As prevailing Chinese slan

g says, “Better unborn than unbred”, which connotes that parents should strengt

hen the supervision over and education of kids. After accepting education in scho

ol, their identities and ideas are deeply affected by diverse instruction system

and even distinguishing courses. For instance, students of science are apt at log

ical thinking, while students of arts are inclined to thinking in image. Granted

that it happens to identical twins, their behaviors are not genetic because life

has presented them with different opportunities.

In the second place, one with innate intellect uncertainly becomes a genius insom

uch as his success owes much to his capabilities and arduous efforts. Take an ins

tance of Charlotte Bronte’s brother who was quite bright during his childhood. O

nly did he depend on his superior intellect, so that neglected his study. Finally

he became an idle person, while his sister became a famous author as a result of

hard study. Even Albert Einstein said, “A genius is that kind of person with 99

percent diligence plus 1 percent intelligence.” Apparently, his success is not

so much by talent as by strenuous work.

In conclusion, no one can choose his nature, but one can be successful after stri

ving for himself and being well educated. Moreover, no one can be triumphant only

relying on his genes. Namely, nurture passes nature.

范文12

V111 Children - Nature or Nurture?

Which one has deeper influence on molding children’s personalities and their development nature or nurture?

In certain respects, children are the same all over the world. But when they grow up, they become quite different. What has caused such considerable changes? I believe nurture plays the crucial role in personality and development of a child. In another word, the circumstances surrounding the child are more important to form its character.

As an old saying remarked, ‘No man is born wise or learned’. Had nobody taught him, a man would even not be able to count from 1 to 10, no matter how talented he were. In fact, a nascent infant to who has scarcely given birth, in certain aspects, is just the same as

a kitten being no aware of so-called character. Its nature is to cry for food when it feels hungry, or cry for release when it feels uncomfortable. That is that. The true story of ‘wolf-child’ can be the best evidence.

On the other hand, the parents, teachers, as well as other people around a child, are the main builders who develop its personality. Learning from the circumstances, the child forms its character and concepts of the world. People always say ‘the best horse needs breeding, and the aptest child needs teaching.’ Without correct guidance, a clear conscience can even go bad. For instance, a father is a deep drug addict, and in most cases, his son starts this dangerous experience very early, by reason of smoky air he has breathed since his childhood. Such situation is not rare. On the contrary, we often hear similar news from media.

As you can tell from my analysis, among all factors affecting the growth of children, nurture is the crucial one, which is much more important than the nature or any other else.

范文13

Nature or nurture, which one has major influence on our personality and development? This issue has been widely debated in our country nowadays. As far as I am concerned, I am inclined to support the standpoint that nurture plays a more crucial role in youngster’s development.

To begin with, scientific research has already proved that the intelligence quotient(IQ) we were born with is not differ from each other too much. We have to admit that the so-called whiz-kids could be found are actually seldom. If we want to lead to any success, we need to rely on postnatal education and self-struggle which are the decisive factors. For example,

Edison was regarded as a fool in his primary school. However, he got uneaqualed achievement by his own efforts.

In the second place, children’s limited natural gift will disappear soon if his/her nurture can not support it sufficient. Only can we say that the advantageous intelligence is a helpful condition to achievement, but the advantages will not last for long. There is Chinese fable: a boy called zy had some talents in poetry, so his father continuous take him to attend feast to boast his gift instead of bringing him to school, several years latter, zy have not any intelligence in composing poems any more. Therefore, we can find how important does the parental education and studying environment are!

Finally, the concept for success given by Einstein also indicates the essential effect of education and hardworking. He said: success is equal to 99% of diligence plus only 1% of genius. From his notion, we can easily find that the diligence is the indispensable element for people’s accomplishments.

From all mentioned above, we can safely come to a conclusion that only education and industry can mould people to be excellent and outstanding, merely depend on

So-called nature gifts are absolutely deficiency.

111(别人写的）

There is a dispute over what plays a chief role in one’s personality and development. Some maintain that it is concluded by the characteristic people born with, whereas others are confident that it defers to the experiences people have had in the life. For my part, I tend t

o share the latter point of view, and I would like to give two major reasons in the following.

On one hand, wealth and material status have an import effect on people’s personality. According to Maslow’s Theory, basic needs is human being’s primary requirement. Without solving the basic demand for food and clothes, people’s character is vulnerable to be ruined and can hardly develop in other spheres. For example, there were twins born in a poor countryside. One of them was adopted by a rich relative and lived in a metropolis, but the other stayed in village. Thirty years later, the urban son grew up into a prosperous professional, while the rural one was uneducated and made a hard life. It is different material condition that contributes to this contrast.

On the other hand, education, particularly the education from one’s childhood to adolescence, has a final say on his development. Children are too young to distinguish good from bad. They ought to be taken under the guidance of parents and teachers. Sensible ideas and decent behaviors lead them to become moral persons. Something evil, otherwise, such as violent films and drugs, make them stray from the right way. Herewith, people with excellent development are usually well educated.

To sum up, diverse contributing factors can be identified, nevertheless, I still insist that acquired experiences have much more influence on people’s personality and development. What we must do is making sure that the positive ones are encouraged and the negative ones are eliminated as far as possible.

Version 00113

some people think that university should not provide theoretical knowledge, but to giv

e practical training benefit to society.

do you agree or disagree. use your own experience and knowledge to support your idea.

范文1

Most universities and colleges spend a rather long period in fundamental

theories and elementary courses. But students regard these kinds of

knowledge useless, and pay less attention to them. They suggest school pay

more time for practical training instead of providing theoretical lessons. In

my opinion, however, theoretical knowledge is necessary. And one will

definitely benefit from it.

First, fundamental theories, such as math and physics, are the basis of other

knowledge. To a student who majors in automatic control, the course of

control system is the most practical and useful in the future. But if he isn’t

good at math and circuit, he will hardly be able to understand the principles

and methods of how to control a subject or process. It is just like

constructing a building. How can you imagine a spectacular high-rise without

a firm groundsill? That is, theories and practices are interrelated. We can

ignore neither of them.

Second, theoretical basic knowledge provides not only the knowledge itself,

but also a way that how to learn and research. University is a place for

scientific research and invention. So it is necessary for students to have the

skill of doing research. Seeing from another angle, science and techniques

are exploding so quickly that present skills will soon be out of date. If one

learnt nothing except practical skills, he would also fall behind the society.

But if one could master the method of research, he would be able to refresh

himself continuously with advanced technology.

From all the commentaries above, we can learn the important role of

theoretical knowledge. Although pragmatism is very popular today, we should

pay enough attention to the basis and principles.

范文2

Nowhere in the world has the issue of student been so much debated as in

our society. In this competitive society, ability of work and employment

experience have become very important features of ordinary students’ futur

e; therefore, many people think that university should teach students the rea

l knowledge that comes from practice and direct experience. The above point

is certainly wrong; this essay will outline three reasons.

The main reason is that students’ study will be delayed and disadvantaged.

The academic knowledge of students will be hard to make greater progress

in order to practical training and employment experience. In this special

period of life, students have the best memory and intellect. If they do not

work hard at study, they will lose it that could be balanced by neither good

employment experience nor information of outside classroom. If students

choose to carefully study academic knowledge in the university, they would

gain a better future.

Another reason is that current knowledge of students is not enough capable

to face practical training’s requirements. If students are not taught

professional theoretical knowledge, they just depend on the basal academic

knowledge that they studied in the high school. In fact, they are really

difficult to progress real practical training and gain abundant employment

experience.

Last but not the least reason is the professional theoretical knowledge that it

is necessary to work of future. For instance, when I graduated from

university, I did not have any employment experience. But, I was hired a

famous network company. I could gain this work chance, only, because of

my professional theoretical knowledge.

In conclusion, the students ought to only study theoretical knowledge in the

university. It is unnecessary to let university that provides plenty of practical

training

范文3

Which kind of courses should universities provide: theoretical knowledge or practical training? Some people prefer the later one and assert that the practical training can benefit our society. Personally, I strongly disagree with their point of view for three reasons.

Among countless factors which influence my propensity, there is a most conspicuous one: practical experience should be accumulated in society, not in universities. I can think of no better illustration than the saying: “society is another kind of university” (Mao Zedong). Literarily, in society people can study practical knowledge as well as studying theoretical knowledge in universities. Besides, campus is full of academic atmosphere, and there is totally different from the circumstance in society. Thus, it is difficult for students to accumulate the real practical experience in campus.

The second aspect relates to the importance of theoretical knowledge. Apparently, it would seem that some academic subjects, such as mathematics or sociology, cannot benefit companies or society directly. In fact, however, they are the basis of practical subjects, such as management or finance. For example, it is almost impossible to talk of economics without mentioning the fundamental roles played by statistics and mathematics.

Furthermore, universities are where theoretical knowledge is handed down from generation to generation. As we know, form Oxford University to Yale University, from Beijing Univ

ersity to MIT, universities congregate a lot of preeminent scholars and professors whose main jobs are the academic research. They are responsible to impart the academic knowledge to the young generation in case of they are faded from our memory.

In summary, from what has been discussed above, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that the theoretical courses are not as obsolete, profitless and unimportant as some people believed. And our universities should be responsible to provide the theoretical knowledge

范文4

along with the shinking job market,the young school leavers found its more and more hard to follow the ideal job,therefore ,they place the blame on the universities today,saying that courses offered by universities cant provide them the enough practical training which ensure them a decent job , a chanllenging and promotion position.i dont think that view can hold water.they dont really understand the function of universities in our society.

its impossible that people experience all important events,only by practical training offered by universities.as the speed of which skills is getting obsolete,the new techolology and science is getting unpredictable.the practical training is far from the enough.the theoritical knowlege provide us unlimited additional experience.we not only can trace back the wisdom of anticedents.we also can keep up with the development of society.sure,its the second- hand experience.few of us can live over 100years,but all of us can live many lives by learning anticedents's second- hand experience.

moreover,the university is not teach us how to earn our bread,but make us every monthful sweeter.thats is to say,they can not guarantee our future jobs.but they can help me to ad

d energy,to rich inspire,to increase knowledge.which set us apart from the schools which only vocational trainings.without a solid theoritical knowledge,the latter cant elicit our creativity.

therefore,we should not measure the university only by how many their grauduates get established in society.结尾忘了，由于作文给了别人，以上所有作文都是回忆的，这个结尾大家自己补充。

范文5

Most universities and colleges spend a rather long period in fundamental theories and elementary courses. But students regard these kinds of knowledge useless, and pay less attention to them. Thus, some people think that university should not provide theoretical knowledge, but to give practical training benefit to society. As for me, I think this view is reasonable in some aspects.

First of all, the theoretical knowledge just handles problem is an abstract concept. It must combine with real job, can just give play to its efficiency. The theoretical knowledge losing contact with reality is nonsensical. For instance, as everyone knows, with the development of society, Work position more and more need experienced talent, that is to say, they need those people who can combine theoretical knowledge with practice. So, more offering practice training to university students can help them to adapt to the society better.

Secondly, the theoretical knowledge root in practice. Any theory knowledge is obtained from the work of practicing. The universities provide practical training to students, make them understand the theoretical knowledge deeply. Just because of this, more and more univ

ersities stipulate that students should participate in social work at least one year in the four years, in order to get practical training.

However, the theoretical knowledge is the quintessence of practice, and it is the important course that we can't ignore too. So, theoretical knowledge and practice have the equal status in our study.

In a word, theory knowledge and practical training are all our required courses. We must study theory knowledge, and then apply it to practice. Just like what a famous sayings said: thoughts can give off brilliant light only when put into actions.

version114

People have different expectation for jobs. Some people prefer to do the

same job for the same company, and some people rather than change the job

frequently. advantage and disadvantage?

赖劲松老师的范文1

Some people prefer to stay in the same job for the same company, but others prefer to change jobs frequently. You should use specific reasons to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both sides.

people rarely have an absolute consensus on the controversial issue whether a man should intend to go in for a life-time career. These day, very few people prefer to always taking

a position.

in some senses, a life-time career has its merits. First, if you stick at taking a post, all angles of the job will have appeared; after some time, you will definitely have a good command of it. Consequently you may become a veteran of the field and earn respect or prestige from others. Second, you can establish an extensive social connections relating to the field, helping you tear down most of the barriers standing in the way of your working endeavor. Finally, mistakes of the routine tasks would be minimized because you have learned the lessons.

however, as the modern society develops, experiencing different jobs has its advantages. Initially, we look at the issue of bribery. Many high-level staff are inclined to accept bribes via power in hand. However, if he knows that someone else will soon take his place, such acts can be avoided. We then look at work motivation. If one works for the same company for a long time without promotion, he may get sick and tired of doing the same daily routine. Nonetheless, a manager should have qualities of a sense of teamwork and the capability of coordination. Therefore, to try various positions can help you gain ground to be promoted.

Conclusion ( 67 words)

In summary, staying in the same post can cultivate one to cut out for the job but involve one in a boring career while changing jobs frequently can be both advantageous by keeping bribery away and providing one with more opportunities of promotion and disadvantageous by making mistakes occasionally. In my opinion, people should seek a decent and good-paid job and pay little attention to changing it.

范文2

Nowadays, whether of not stay in one position for a long time is a problem that worried about a lot of people. To understand the solution, let’s take a closer look at the two sides of both at first.

The merit of going in for a life-time career is obvious. Firstly, long time working in the same position can help one become an expert in this area, for it is natural to get familiar with your work from every angle and accumulate abundant experience. In addition, mistakes of the routine tasks would be minimized because you have learned the lessons. However, the defect is also caused by the long time unchanging job. As every one’s patience is different, some may feel that the longer they do the same job, the less interest and power they may have.

In comparison, if one person changes job frequently, he or she never annoy about this problem, which is the best advantage of doing like this.

Once the worker feels bored with job, changing it directly. But this would make one person not good at any subjects that he or she did. What is worst, while the competition of job is getting sharper and sharper, who can be sure of finding a job whenever he or she wants?

Therefore, since each of two ways shows a unique quality, the better way, in my opinion, is to try some jobs at first in order to make an aim. Once seeking the job you like, don’t alert it easily and devote yourself to it

范文3

In the last few years, with the development of society, working in a place all along has already become history. People can choose their job freely, so, people have different expectation for jobs. Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company, and some people rather than change the job frequently. This dispute has brought our attention.

First of all, the free choice of the job is the inevitable outcome of the social development. People can give play to their different ability in different work positions. To a person gifted in many ways, it is very challenging to often change the job. For example, a person has very outstanding ability, in the specific field. He can change his job after working some time in one place, in order to seek kind development. Moreover, a person has very good ability in many aspects, then, He can often change and work, in order to seek the feeling of freshness or raise the quality of life.

However, to some people or some specific posts, it is impossible to often change the job. For instance, an accountant, he only grasps the knowledge and experience of accounting, he can work perfectly within the specific limits, and then changing job is unnecessary to him. Furthermore, in order to make the scientific payoffs, some scientists dedicate themselves to the scientific undertaking.

So, I think whether people should change the job frequently, should depend on their personal situation or their working position. As a saying goes, it is one-sided to treat the question in isolation.

因篇幅问题不能全部显示，请点此查看更多更全内容

查看全文